Sunday, October 26, 2014

The Universe



"You gotta ride said the Doktor of space
I have lived here once before ... "

From Blows Against the Empire - Hijack -
Jefferson Starship - 1970

The universe is either big or small.  From the standard
 perspective,  gazing up from earth, it appears very large.
If the universe is contained in some physical way, which
seems kind of logical, then from the outside, especially
at sufficient distance it could, should, maybe would
appear very small.

So, science, has focused on observing the very small,
as well as observing, what we call large from our
perspective.   It seems like what this has provided us with,
at this point, is that the large is mirrored ( in some way ) in
the small or perhaps the other way around.   In many ways,
we should not be so surprised by this because, we are
using the same mechanism of observation in either case,
by which I mean the process of observation
while perhaps not identical is connected.

So for example you have this:


The Universe in a Single Atom: 

The Convergence of Science 

and Spirituality - by the Dalai Lama.


Sadly, I have not read this book, however, I think I  
might get some of the idea.

But this - "to see a world in a grain of sand" is from
Auguries of Innocence is a poem from William Blake.

and then this interesting link

How to See the World in a Grain of Sand

and this from J. E. Esslemont : 

The Agnosticism


and this

Universe in a drop of water

and

Nasa

all this is very linky, sadly, but I think you should
get an idea.  So we'd like not to strain the brain,
so much, nevertheless, sometimes a little strain
is not so bad, and perhaps can be refreshing.
And what is really getting bruised then, the
heart or the mind.


The interesting question, appears, as to the
divergence of human opinion, point of view.
What I mean is the question of the seemingly
different natures of the immediately
( stick a needle in it ) pragmatic vs. the some
what more fluid - less box-able spiritual
sensibility, that yet might seem somewhat similar.

As an aside, I always thought the quote above
was " the daughter of space ".


Friday, October 17, 2014

Age of Reason



This is either a book

a book by Thomas Paine 1794 - 1807,

or

Jean Paul Sarte, 1945

or

17th century philosophy

including -

 René DescartesBaruch Spinoza, and Gottfried Leibniz

links point to wikipedia

and most of this is from wikipedia.

and now beginning with 18th century

we have the age of enlightenment ( ???? ).

Anyway, it sounds like this to me,
before that everyone was irrational and then
they sucked all the reason out of that
reason tree and concluded they has something
better.

I'm not really sure where we are today.
I have to think about it some more

a link or so they say



I just want to add this link - for Pete's sake,

( some kind of circular reference )

to

Miles Mathis


in part because - it reminds me a lot of Ghost Busters.

Also because of his use of field wave,
which I can't find any reference to.

Unfortunately, I have not sufficiently immersed myself in the
totality of this work, but am very interested in what I
have read so far.  However, I really like the last paragraph
here:

pilot wave

Just so you know I remain " big fan " of David Bohm,
and believe " Wholeness and the Implicate Order ",
should be required for all high school physics courses.

As far as " non-locality " is concerned, still examining
more of this Miles Mathis material, as I have not
digested his view of entanglement.




Monday, October 06, 2014

UFT vs UFT



From
Einstein’s Unified Field Theory Program
Tilman Sauer∗
Einstein Papers Project
California Institute of Technology 20-7
Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
tilman@einstein.caltech.edu
Version of April 11, 2007

a quote by Dr. Einstein

I believe that every true theorist is a kind of tamed metaphysicist,
no matter how pure a “positivist” he may fancy himself. The
metaphysicist believes that the logically simple is also the real.
The tamed metaphysicist believes that not all that is logically
simple is embodied in experienced reality, but that the totality of
all sensory experience can be “comprehended” on the basis of a
conceptual system built on premises of great simplicity. (Einstein
1950, p. 13)
[Einstein 1950a] Einstein, Albert. “On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation.”
Scientific American 182 (1950), 13–17.

So this is the Unified Field Theory vs. Universal Field Theory -

The first one -

There are 3 " classical " fields - 1) electric 2) gravitational 3) magnetic -

and how to interconnect them --- ( very tricky problem really ).

Now:

The second one says -

for every measurable field there is a measuring device, which
can be built to measure the field and we can think of them
as " configurations " of a qubit register.

So it is my first conjecture that  a total number of configurations
of qubit registers can be calculated somehow.

My second conjecture is that there is some kind of relationship
between the two ideas, the two UFTs - which I think would frame
itself as a relationship - somehow - between qubits and some
form of energy.

Fortunately we do have a model for a device which deals with
multiple fields, and that would of course be the human brain,
which somehow does this - 
( measures a variety of fields ).